Should 'dangerous dogs' be banned?

Recent reports in the press about dog attacks and illegal breeds have put the Dangerous Dogs Act back under the spotlight.

The tragic death of four-year-old John Paul Massey in Liverpool last November brought the law under public scrutiny and this week it was revealed that three-year-old Zara Tarout was injured after she was bitten by a dog in Islington, London.

This highlights yet again an urgent need for the Act to be repealed and redrawn into a workable piece of legislation that can be enforced by police and dog wardens.

The Blue Cross urges people not to make judgements based on an animal’s breed alone. Research shows that a dog’s behaviour is heavily influenced by its upbringing, training and the behaviour of its owner as much as it is by genetics.

Our director of external affairs, Steve Goody, says: “We believe this Act does not currently control dangerous dogs. Further legislation needs to centre on the legal duty of the dog owner, who must ultimately be responsible for training their dog and ensuring that it is not a risk to the public.

“Clear penalties for those whose dogs are out of control need to be introduced and enforced by all the relevant authorities including the police and dog wardens.”

Zara Tarout’s mother has called for changes to the law so that dogs are not allowed in council housing. But Steve says: “The suggested blanket ban on dogs in council housing would penalise many responsible dog owners who understand the importance of careful breeding, early socialisation and training. Any dog can make a safe and loving pet if these basic principles are followed.”  

Please read our advice about safety around dogs